[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240607211358.4660-3-21cnbao@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:13:58 +1200
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
david@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: chrisl@...nel.org,
kasong@...cent.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
minchan@...nel.org,
ryan.roberts@....com,
surenb@...gle.com,
v-songbaohua@...o.com,
willy@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: set pte writable while pte_soft_dirty() is true in do_swap_page()
From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
This patch leverages the new pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp() helper to optimize
a scenario where softdirty is enabled, but the softdirty flag has already
been set in do_swap_page(). In this situation, we can use pte_mkwrite
instead of applying write-protection since we don't depend on write
faults.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index db9130488231..a063e489446d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4322,7 +4322,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (!folio_test_ksm(folio) &&
(exclusive || folio_ref_count(folio) == 1)) {
if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) && !userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, pte) &&
- !vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma)) {
+ !pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp(vma, pte)) {
pte = pte_mkwrite(pte, vma);
if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists