[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmK5C09Sc0I75z8A@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:38:51 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio/pci: s390: Fix issues preventing
VFIO_PCI_MMAP=y for s390 and enable it
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 11:27:18AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Hi Alex,
> If we expect any conflicts with 1/ in the next merge window I can take
> a branch for it and apply 2/ and 3/ through the vfio tree, otherwise I
> can bring them all through the vfio tree if the s390 folks agree.
Yes. Pull it via the vfio tree, please.
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists