linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] pwm: cros-ec: Some simplifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240607084416.897777-5-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri,  7 Jun 2024 10:44:14 +0200
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@...libre.com>
To: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pwm: cros-ec: Some simplifications

Hello,

here come some simplifications for the cros-ec PWM driver and a followup
change in the core. The latter was the motivator for me, as I intend to
work on some changes how PWM wave forms are represented and this reduces
the number of code locations I have to care for.

I claim in the commit log that the changes work just fine, however I
only build-test them, so a runtime test from someone with a cros-ec
device would be very welcome.

Best regards
Uwe

Uwe Kleine-König (3):
  pwm: cros-ec: Don't care about consumers in .get_state()
  pwm: cros-ec: Simplify device tree xlation
  pwm: Make pwm_request_from_chip() private to the core

 drivers/pwm/core.c        |  8 ++---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 63 ++++++++-------------------------------
 include/linux/pwm.h       | 12 --------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

base-commit: 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0
-- 
2.43.0