lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 10:28:42 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
To: Aniket <aniketmaurya@...gle.com>, Alexandre Belloni
	 <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Billy Tsai
	 <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
Cc: linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i3c: dw: Fix IBI intr signal programming

Hi Aniket,

> IBI_SIR_REQ_REJECT register is not present if the IP
> has IC_HAS_IBI_DATA = 1 set.

I don't have any access to the IP itself, but I understand there are a
few different configuration settings in the IP that may affect the
register interface.

I think we're OK in this case (just not reading the value out of the
SIR_REQ_REJECT register), but any thoughts on adding corresponding
switches in the driver so we can support those configurations? These
would be represented as DT config of the specific hardware instance - at
the most granular, just by the specific compatible string.

> dw_i3c_master_set_sir_enabled(struct dw_i3c_master *master,
>  
>         reg = readl(master->regs + IBI_SIR_REQ_REJECT);
>         if (enable) {
> -               global = reg == 0xffffffff;
> +               global = !master->sir_en_cnt++;
>                 reg &= ~BIT(idx);
>         } else {
>                 bool hj_rejected = !!(readl(master->regs + DEVICE_CTRL) & DEV_CTRL_HOT_JOIN_NACK);
>  
>                 reg |= BIT(idx);
> -               global = (reg == 0xffffffff) && hj_rejected;
> +               global = (!--master->sir_en_cnt) && hj_rejected;
>         }

Could we use the SIR mask for this, but just read it from a field in the
struct dw_i3c_master, instead of IBI_SIR_REQ_REJECT?

This would mean that there's no possibility of the counter going out of
sync from the SIR settings - say, on underflow if we get a spurious
disable.

Cheers,


Jeremy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ