linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri,  7 Jun 2024 18:01:19 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: alx@...nel.org,
	linux-man@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de,
	mark.rutland@....com,
	ryan.roberts@....com,
	broonie@...nel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@....com,
	Anshuman.Khandual@....com,
	DeepakKumar.Mishra@....com,
	AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask

The handler is registered with sigaction(), not sigprocmask(). Even if the
purpose of writing sigprocmask() here was to mention blocked signals, the
statement currently concerns the "addition" of blocked signals; signals
blocked through sigprocmask() would already be present in the thread
context of blocked signals.

Fixes: e7a5700 (getcontext.3, signal.7: tfix)
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
---
 man/man7/signal.7 | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/man/man7/signal.7 b/man/man7/signal.7
index 17e75c86d..09d30c678 100644
--- a/man/man7/signal.7
+++ b/man/man7/signal.7
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ execution of the handler.)
 Any signals specified in
 .I act\->sa_mask
 when registering the handler with
-.BR sigprocmask (2)
+.BR sigaction (2)
 are added to the thread's signal mask.
 The signal being delivered is also
 added to the signal mask, unless
-- 
2.34.1