linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: Rename sigaltstack to generic signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZmMA-5HHglADRyXt@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:45:47 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, stsp2@...dex.ru, mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com, ryan.roberts@....com,
	suzuki.poulose@....com, Anshuman.Khandual@....com,
	DeepakKumar.Mishra@....com, AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@....com,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: Rename sigaltstack to generic signal

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 05:53:18PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:

> Rename sigaltstack to signal, and rename the existing test to
> sigaltstack.c.

I think this is reasonable if we're going to add more generic signal
tests - sigaltstack is a fairly small bit of functionality and having it
covered as part of a broader signal suite and the overhead of setting up
the suite separately is probably not worth it.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)