[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbpL=HUXj0hFAo+JNki_RA9aix2sW1cg13g9=89d93PZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 11:35:59 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with
fsl,pins property
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:17 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
> There was a v6 that use generic properties, but at a late stage, NXP
> internals decides to switch to fsl,pins property to align with other
> i.MXs. Since new properties, drivers rewrite, I start this patchset
> from v1 with a new patch title. A RFC patch for binding was posted,
> since Rob said he is fine, so post this patchset out.
>
> Whether v6 or this patchset, patch 2 is a must and was not changed from
> v6.
>
> The pinctrl stuff has been pending for quite sometime, I would be
> apprecaited if any quick comments.
>
> v6:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-0-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/
> RFC:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org/
Patches applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists