[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmQovC6TbDpTb3c8@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 12:47:40 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Crescent Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Adjustments and Enhancements for MOXA PCI Serial
Boards
Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 07:43:30PM +0800, Crescent Hsieh kirjoitti:
> There are 6 patches within this patch series to make some adjustments
> and enhancements for MOXA PCI serial boards, a briefly description is
> written below:
>
> - The first patch is an independent bug fix patch.
> - The second and third patches migrate some MOXA PCI devices from
> `mxser.c` to `8250_pci.c`.
> - The fourth and fifth patches address improvements and adjustments in
> handling the serial interface.
> - The sixth patch adds a UART configuration that aligns with the
> hardware capabilities of MOXA PCI serial boards.
Everything is fine except one issue. Can we avoid polluting 8250_pci?
What I would expect as a patch 2 is a separation of 8250_moxa from
8250_pci (see examples how it was done in the past: 8250_exar, 8250_lpss,
8250_mid, ...) and then updating code there. Can it be achievable?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists