linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] block: fix request.queuelist usage in flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat,  8 Jun 2024 22:31:15 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To: axboe@...nel.dk,
	ming.lei@...hat.com,
	hch@....de,
	f.weber@...xmox.com,
	bvanassche@....org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chengming.zhou@...ux.dev,
	zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] block: fix request.queuelist usage in flush

Friedrich Weber reported a kernel crash problem and bisected to commit
81ada09cc25e ("blk-flush: reuse rq queuelist in flush state machine").

The root cause is that we use "list_move_tail(&rq->queuelist, pending)"
in the PREFLUSH/POSTFLUSH sequences. But rq->queuelist.next == xxx since
it's popped out from plug->cached_rq in __blk_mq_alloc_requests_batch().
We don't initialize its queuelist just for this first request, although
the queuelist of all later popped requests will be initialized.

Fix it by changing to use "list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, pending)" so
rq->queuelist doesn't need to be initialized. It should be ok since rq
can't be on any list when PREFLUSH or POSTFLUSH, has no move actually.

Please note the commit 81ada09cc25e ("blk-flush: reuse rq queuelist in
flush state machine") also has another requirement that no drivers would
touch rq->queuelist after blk_mq_end_request() since we will reuse it to
add rq to the post-flush pending list in POSTFLUSH. If this is not true,
we will have to revert that commit IMHO.

This updated version adds "list_del_init(&rq->queuelist)" in flush rq
callback since the dm layer may submit request of a weird invalid format
(REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH), which causes double list_add
if without this "list_del_init(&rq->queuelist)". The weird invalid format
problem should be fixed in dm layer.

Reported-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@...xmox.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/14b89dfb-505c-49f7-aebb-01c54451db40@proxmox.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c9d03ff7-27c5-4ebd-b3f6-5a90d96f35ba@proxmox.com/
Fixes: 81ada09cc25e ("blk-flush: reuse rq queuelist in flush state machine")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc: bvanassche@....org
Tested-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@...xmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
---
 block/blk-flush.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index c17cf8ed8113..cca4f9131f79 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
 		/* queue for flush */
 		if (list_empty(pending))
 			fq->flush_pending_since = jiffies;
-		list_move_tail(&rq->queuelist, pending);
+		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, pending);
 		break;

 	case REQ_FSEQ_DATA:
@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret flush_end_io(struct request *flush_rq,
 		unsigned int seq = blk_flush_cur_seq(rq);

 		BUG_ON(seq != REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH && seq != REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH);
+		list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
 		blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, seq, error);
 	}

-- 
2.20.1