[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e28b0c45fe8f28ca4475fe0027f8099c41259f0.1717855701.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:34:18 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: jk@...abs.org,
joel@....id.au,
alistair@...ple.id.au,
eajames@...ux.ibm.com,
parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com,
christian.gromm@...rochip.com,
willy@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] fsi: occ: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API
ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().
Note that the upper limit of ida_simple_get() is exclusive, but the one of
ida_alloc_range() is inclusive. So, this upper limit, INT_MAX, should have
been changed to INT_MAX-1.
But, it is likely that the INT_MAX 'idx' is valid that the max value passed
to ida_simple_get() should have been 0.
So, allow this INT_MAX 'idx' value now.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
---
The change related to the INT_MAX value is speculative.
Review with care. (or I can re-submit with INT_MAX-1, to be safe :))
This patch has been sent about 5 months ago [1].
A gentle reminder has been sent 3 months later and an R-by has been given
[2].
However, it has still not reached -next in the last 2 months.
So, I've added the R-b tag and I'm adding Andrew Morton in To:, in order to
help in the merge process.
Thanks
CJ
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6e17f2145ce2bbc12af6700c8bd56a8a7bdb103d.1705738045.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/57291e66-fb7d-4ef8-985e-7e85866c90bb@linux.ibm.com/
---
drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
index da35ca9e84a6..f7157c1d77d8 100644
--- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
+++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
@@ -656,17 +656,16 @@ static int occ_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
rc = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "reg", ®);
if (!rc) {
/* make sure we don't have a duplicate from dts */
- occ->idx = ida_simple_get(&occ_ida, reg, reg + 1,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ occ->idx = ida_alloc_range(&occ_ida, reg, reg,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (occ->idx < 0)
- occ->idx = ida_simple_get(&occ_ida, 1, INT_MAX,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ occ->idx = ida_alloc_min(&occ_ida, 1,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
} else {
- occ->idx = ida_simple_get(&occ_ida, 1, INT_MAX,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ occ->idx = ida_alloc_min(&occ_ida, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
}
} else {
- occ->idx = ida_simple_get(&occ_ida, 1, INT_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
+ occ->idx = ida_alloc_min(&occ_ida, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
}
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, occ);
@@ -680,7 +679,7 @@ static int occ_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
rc = misc_register(&occ->mdev);
if (rc) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register miscdevice: %d\n", rc);
- ida_simple_remove(&occ_ida, occ->idx);
+ ida_free(&occ_ida, occ->idx);
kvfree(occ->buffer);
return rc;
}
@@ -719,7 +718,7 @@ static int occ_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
else
device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, occ_unregister_of_child);
- ida_simple_remove(&occ_ida, occ->idx);
+ ida_free(&occ_ida, occ->idx);
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists