| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240608155316.451600-2-flintglass@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:53:08 +0000
From: Takero Funaki <flintglass@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
Cc: Takero Funaki <flintglass@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: zswap: fix global shrinker memcg iteration
This patch fixes an issue where the zswap global shrinker stopped
iterating through the memcg tree.
The problem was that `shrink_worker()` would stop iterating when a memcg
was being offlined and restart from the tree root. Now, it properly
handles the offlining memcg and continues shrinking with the next memcg.
This patch also modified handing of the lock for offlined memcg cleaner
to adapt the change in the iteration, and avoid negligibly rare skipping
of a memcg from shrink iteration.
Fixes: a65b0e7607cc ("zswap: make shrinking memcg-aware")
Signed-off-by: Takero Funaki <flintglass@...il.com>
---
mm/zswap.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 80c634acb8d5..d720a42069b6 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -827,12 +827,27 @@ void zswap_folio_swapin(struct folio *folio)
}
}
+/*
+ * This function should be called when a memcg is being offlined.
+ *
+ * Since the global shrinker shrink_worker() may hold a reference
+ * of the memcg, we must check and release the reference in
+ * zswap_next_shrink.
+ *
+ * shrink_worker() must handle the case where this function releases
+ * the reference of memcg being shrunk.
+ */
void zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
/* lock out zswap shrinker walking memcg tree */
spin_lock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
- if (zswap_next_shrink == memcg)
- zswap_next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, zswap_next_shrink, NULL);
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(zswap_next_shrink) == memcg) {
+ /* put back reference and advance the cursor */
+ memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(zswap_next_shrink, memcg);
+ }
+
spin_unlock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
}
@@ -1401,25 +1416,44 @@ static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
{
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
+ struct mem_cgroup *next_memcg;
int ret, failures = 0;
unsigned long thr;
/* Reclaim down to the accept threshold */
thr = zswap_accept_thr_pages();
- /* global reclaim will select cgroup in a round-robin fashion. */
+ /* global reclaim will select cgroup in a round-robin fashion.
+ *
+ * We save iteration cursor memcg into zswap_next_shrink,
+ * which can be modified by the offline memcg cleaner
+ * zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup().
+ *
+ * Since the offline cleaner is called only once, we cannot abandone
+ * offline memcg reference in zswap_next_shrink.
+ * We can rely on the cleaner only if we get online memcg under lock.
+ * If we get offline memcg, we cannot determine the cleaner will be
+ * called later. We must put it before returning from this function.
+ */
do {
+iternext:
spin_lock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
- zswap_next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, zswap_next_shrink, NULL);
- memcg = zswap_next_shrink;
+ next_memcg = READ_ONCE(zswap_next_shrink);
+
+ if (memcg != next_memcg) {
+ /*
+ * Ours was released by offlining.
+ * Use the saved memcg reference.
+ */
+ memcg = next_memcg;
+ } else {
+ /* advance cursor */
+ memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(zswap_next_shrink, memcg);
+ }
/*
- * We need to retry if we have gone through a full round trip, or if we
- * got an offline memcg (or else we risk undoing the effect of the
- * zswap memcg offlining cleanup callback). This is not catastrophic
- * per se, but it will keep the now offlined memcg hostage for a while.
- *
* Note that if we got an online memcg, we will keep the extra
* reference in case the original reference obtained by mem_cgroup_iter
* is dropped by the zswap memcg offlining callback, ensuring that the
@@ -1434,16 +1468,25 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
}
if (!mem_cgroup_tryget_online(memcg)) {
- /* drop the reference from mem_cgroup_iter() */
- mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
- zswap_next_shrink = NULL;
+ /*
+ * It is an offline memcg which we cannot shrink
+ * until its pages are reparented.
+ *
+ * Since we cannot determine if the offline cleaner has
+ * been already called or not, the offline memcg must be
+ * put back unconditonally. We cannot abort the loop while
+ * zswap_next_shrink has a reference of this offline memcg.
+ */
spin_unlock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
-
- if (++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
- break;
-
- goto resched;
+ goto iternext;
}
+ /*
+ * We got an extra memcg reference before unlocking.
+ * The cleaner cannot free it using zswap_next_shrink.
+ *
+ * Our memcg can be offlined after we get online memcg here.
+ * In this case, the cleaner is waiting the lock just behind us.
+ */
spin_unlock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
ret = shrink_memcg(memcg);
@@ -1457,6 +1500,12 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
resched:
cond_resched();
} while (zswap_total_pages() > thr);
+
+ /*
+ * We can still hold the original memcg reference.
+ * The reference is stored in zswap_next_shrink, and then reused
+ * by the next shrink_worker().
+ */
}
/*********************************
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists