linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202406081214.qFAil90A-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 12:45:05 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to
 load the firmware

Hi Arnaud,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20240607-183305
base:   1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240607093326.369090-6-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v6 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240608/202406081214.qFAil90A-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240608/202406081214.qFAil90A-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406081214.qFAil90A-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/fortify-string.h:6,
                    from include/linux/string.h:374,
                    from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:7,
                    from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:9:
>> arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:53:21: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '{' token
      53 | #define WARN_ON(x) ({                                   \
         |                     ^
   include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h:94:9: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ON'
      94 |         WARN_ON(1);
         |         ^~~~~~~
   In file included from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:23:
   include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h:96:9: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
      96 |         return NULL;
         |         ^~~~~~
   include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h:97:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
      97 | }
         | ^
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:717:34: error: 'tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table'?
     717 |         .find_loaded_rsc_table = tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table,
         |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                  rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table


vim +53 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h

a9df8e325d0de5 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h Heiko Carstens 2010-01-13  52  
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27 @53  #define WARN_ON(x) ({					\
fd0cbdd378258f include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-08-02  54  	int __ret_warn_on = !!(x);			\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  55  	if (__builtin_constant_p(__ret_warn_on)) {	\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  56  		if (__ret_warn_on)			\
b2be05273a1744 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h Ben Hutchings  2010-04-03  57  			__WARN();			\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  58  	} else {					\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  59  		if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on))		\
b2be05273a1744 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h Ben Hutchings  2010-04-03  60  			__WARN();			\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  61  	}						\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  62  	unlikely(__ret_warn_on);			\
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  63  })
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  64  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki