lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:23:42 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads

Hello,

Eric, I can't understand why the commit ("signal: Guarantee that
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT is set on process exit") added the new
quick_threads counter. And why, if we forget about --quick_threads,
synchronize_group_exit() has to take siglock unconditionally.
Did I miss something obvious?

Tejun, could you check the note about css_task_iter_advance() in
the changelog? And can't it use thread_group_empty() instead?

Oleg.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ