linux-kernel - Re: [PING ;)] Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a5jswtox.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:15:10 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Frederic Weisbecker
 <frederic@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Nicholas Piggin
 <npiggin@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Phil Auld
 <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PING ;)] Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse
 smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device()

On Mon, Jun 10 2024 at 17:55, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> should I redo and/or resend this patch (and the next one on top of it) ?

I lost track of the maze in this discussion. As the patch is obviously
correct, I just apply it as is and any cosmetic changes can go on top.

Thanks,

        tglx