linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm: rust: Enable Rust support for ARMv7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f798777d-6a56-45d4-8136-6aa9e0e77abc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:37:04 +0200
From: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@....com>,
 Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm: rust: Enable Rust support for ARMv7

On 10.06.24 9:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> --- a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ support corresponds to ``S`` values in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file.
>>  =============  ================  ==============================================
>>  Architecture   Level of support  Constraints
>>  =============  ================  ==============================================
>> +``arm``        Maintained        ARMv7 Little Endian only.
> 
> Might be a FAQ, but what does Maintained mean here? Should you be
> adding yourself to the RUST entry in MAINTAINERS? You are Maintaining
> Rust on ARMv7 and so should be given credit/responsibility for that in
> MAINTAINERS?

>From my side I can/will take a look if there are issues/patches related to this, but I 
can't be sure how fast I'll be able to respond and I don't feel qualified to handle
larger or more complicated issues myself.

But there isn't a MAINTAINERS entry depending on the architecture, so I'm not sure
who will be responsible for this.

Miguel how is the support handled for the other architectures?