linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] docs: i2c: summary: document use of inclusive language

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:29:08 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] docs: i2c: summary: document use of inclusive
 language

Hi Easwar,

> What's the combined effect of this documentation update in terms of the
> recommendation for switching over the Linux kernel? Are we to use
> controller/client or controller/target?

I am not sure I understand the question properly?

"controller/target" as in the specs, and "adapter/client" when it comes
to the Linux implementation (which has been like this forever). I'd
think it is too much churn to change this as well.

> Confused,

Heh, me too now...

All the best,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)