lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <iizkptuud2bcqnfvyvfomdbsakywyszzfmyawgsymsdvkatyyz@eze75wfqoczl>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:29:08 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] docs: i2c: summary: document use of inclusive
 language

Hi Easwar,

> What's the combined effect of this documentation update in terms of the
> recommendation for switching over the Linux kernel? Are we to use
> controller/client or controller/target?

I am not sure I understand the question properly?

"controller/target" as in the specs, and "adapter/client" when it comes
to the Linux implementation (which has been like this forever). I'd
think it is too much churn to change this as well.

> Confused,

Heh, me too now...

All the best,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ