linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] media: uvcvideo: Refactor Power Line Frequency limit selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 01:05:01 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] media: uvcvideo: Refactor Power Line Frequency limit selection

Hi Laurent

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 17:21, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> > +static int __uvc_ctrl_add_mapping(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > +     struct uvc_control *ctrl, const struct uvc_control_mapping *mapping);
>
> I wonder if we could avoid the forward declaration by turning the
> .add_mapping() operation into a .filter_mapping() (name to be
> bikshedded) that would return a replacement mapping instead of adding
> it. The caller (the __uvc_ctrl_add_custom_mapping() function) would then
> call __uvc_ctrl_add_mapping() unconditionally. You could actually call
> the new operation directly in __uvc_ctrl_add_custom_mapping() without
> having to add a new __uvc_ctrl_add_custom_mapping() function. What do
> you think, would that be simpler and more redable ?

Let me add it as a forward patch, let me know what you think.

Regards!