lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c0235d7-219f-4a3e-bb58-eb662f61f570@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:59:23 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Consolidate identical branches



On 21.05.24 г. 15:48 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> It's pointless to have 2 identical branches one after the other, simply
> collapse them in a single branch. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>

Ping

> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 69265c0acaea..369037a166fd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -1732,12 +1732,11 @@ static void generic_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>   {
>   	c->extended_cpuid_level = 0;
>   
> -	if (!have_cpuid_p())
> +	if (!have_cpuid_p()) {
>   		identify_cpu_without_cpuid(c);
> -
> -	/* cyrix could have cpuid enabled via c_identify()*/
> -	if (!have_cpuid_p())
> +		/* cyrix could have cpuid enabled via c_identify()*/
>   		return;
> +	}
>   
>   	cpu_detect(c);
>   

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ