linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/highmem: make nr_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <962615d7-d20f-43c2-84a4-a7b99d8dfeca@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:23:13 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/highmem: make nr_free_highpages() return
 "unsigned long"

On 08.06.24 02:51, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 10:37:11AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> It looks rather weird that totalhigh_pages() returns an
>> "unsigned long" but nr_free_highpages() returns an "unsigned int".
>>
>> Let's return an "unsigned long" from nr_free_highpages() to be
>> consistent.
>>
>> While at it, use a plain "0" instead of a "0UL" in the !CONFIG_HIGHMEM
>> totalhigh_pages() implementation, to make these look alike as well.
> 
> I am not sure why not use 0UL for both?

See my reply to Oscar, thanks for the review!

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb