[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmbHpTXlSP4T0JqI@J2N7QTR9R3>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:13 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] perf: arm_v6/7_pmu: Drop non-DT probe support
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:31:27PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> There are no non-DT based PMU users for v6 or v7, so drop the custom
> non-DT probe table.
>
> Note that this drops support for arm1156 PMU, but there are no arm1156
> based systems supported in the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
It might be worth adding an explciit note that xscale still has non-DT
support, and hence we need to retain the infrastructure for that.
Regardless:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c | 17 +----------------
> drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c | 10 +---------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c
> index f7593843bb85..0bb685b4bac5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c
> @@ -401,13 +401,6 @@ static int armv6_1136_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int armv6_1156_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> -{
> - armv6pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
> - cpu_pmu->name = "armv6_1156";
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int armv6_1176_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> {
> armv6pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
> @@ -421,17 +414,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv6_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> { /* sentinel value */ }
> };
>
> -static const struct pmu_probe_info armv6_pmu_probe_table[] = {
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1136, armv6_1136_pmu_init),
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1156, armv6_1156_pmu_init),
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1176, armv6_1176_pmu_init),
> - { /* sentinel value */ }
> -};
> -
> static int armv6_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv6_pmu_of_device_ids,
> - armv6_pmu_probe_table);
> + return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv6_pmu_of_device_ids, NULL);
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver armv6_pmu_driver = {
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
> index fdd936fbd188..928ac3d626ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
> @@ -1977,17 +1977,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv7_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> {},
> };
>
> -static const struct pmu_probe_info armv7_pmu_probe_table[] = {
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A8, armv7_a8_pmu_init),
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9, armv7_a9_pmu_init),
> - { /* sentinel value */ }
> -};
> -
> -
> static int armv7_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv7_pmu_of_device_ids,
> - armv7_pmu_probe_table);
> + return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv7_pmu_of_device_ids, NULL);
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver armv7_pmu_driver = {
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists