[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bk496seb.fsf@somnus>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:47:40 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: Phil Chang <phil.chang@...iatek.com>
Cc: alix.wu@...iatek.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
frederic@...nel.org, jy.ho@...iatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, phil.chang@...iatek.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hrtimer: check hrtimer with a NULL function
Phil Chang <phil.chang@...iatek.com> writes:
> Since hrtimers do not allow a NULL function to be passed,
> to prevent a kernel crash, return before adding the timer to a queue.
You could point out in the commit message, where the kernel would crash
when using a hrtimer with a NULL pointer as function pointer. And it
shouldn't be a problem to use more than a single sentence for a commit
message :)
> Signed-off-by: Phil Chang <phil.chang@...iatek.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index 492c14aac642..d32c1afe59b3 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -1285,6 +1285,9 @@ void hrtimer_start_range_ns(struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t tim,
> struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (WARN_ON(!timer->function))
> + return;
> +
Please use a WARN_ON_ONCE() (as documented in
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
> /*
> * Check whether the HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT bit and hrtimer.is_soft
> * match on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT = n. With PREEMPT_RT check the hard
Thanks,
Anna-Maria
Powered by blists - more mailing lists