| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:48:11 +0200 From: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, m.nirmaladevi@...s.com, bhargav.r@...s.com, lee@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, u-kumar1@...com Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Fix the number of irqs for TPS65224 and TPS6594 On 6/4/24 14:10, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 19:01-20240603, Thomas Richard wrote: >> The number of irqs is computed to allocate the right amount of memory for >> the irq data. An array of struct tps6594_regulator_irq_data is allocated >> one time for all the irqs. Each irq uses one cell of the array. >> >> If the computed number of irqs is not correct, not allocated memory could >> be used. >> >> Fix the values used in the calculation for TPS6594 and TPS65224. >> >> Fixes: 00c826525fba (regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC regulators) >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> >> --- > > > Thanks a ton for fixing this - this solved a bunch of random regressions > we were tracking: > am62axx_sk, am69_sk, j721e-idk, j721s2-evm in addition to J7200 evm as > well. > > Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> > > > This was definitely a 6.10 regression, could we fast track it in? Hi Nishanth, FYI, I also found an other 6.10 regression for j721s2-evm and j7200-evm: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240603082110.2104977-1-thomas.richard@bootlin.com/ Regards, Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists