linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/6] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:07:48 +0000
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
To: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
	<namhyung@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	<irogers@...gle.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <kees@...nel.org>, <gustavoars@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <ananth.narayan@....com>,
	<gautham.shenoy@....com>, <kprateek.nayak@....com>, <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
	<sandipan.das@....com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Dhananjay Ugwekar
	<Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global

To support AMD's per_core RAPL counter, we will need to check 
per_core capability of the current rapl_model multiple times in
rapl_cpu_online/offline, init_rapl_pmus functions, so cache the
matched rapl model in a global variable, to avoid calling
x86_match_cpu() multiple times.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
---
 arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index b4e2073a178e..e5e878146542 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static cpumask_t rapl_cpu_mask;
 static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
 static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
 static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
+static struct rapl_model *rapl_model;
 
 static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
 {
@@ -614,18 +615,18 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int rapl_check_hw_unit(struct rapl_model *rm)
+static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void)
 {
 	u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits;
 	int i;
 
 	/* protect rdmsrl() to handle virtualization */
-	if (rdmsrl_safe(rm->msr_power_unit, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits))
+	if (rdmsrl_safe(rapl_model->msr_power_unit, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits))
 		return -1;
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_RAPL_DOMAINS; i++)
 		rapl_hw_unit[i] = (msr_rapl_power_unit_bits >> 8) & 0x1FULL;
 
-	switch (rm->unit_quirk) {
+	switch (rapl_model->unit_quirk) {
 	/*
 	 * DRAM domain on HSW server and KNL has fixed energy unit which can be
 	 * different than the unit from power unit MSR. See
@@ -839,21 +840,20 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, rapl_model_match);
 static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
-	struct rapl_model *rm;
 	int ret;
 
 	id = x86_match_cpu(rapl_model_match);
 	if (!id)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	rm = (struct rapl_model *) id->driver_data;
+	rapl_model = (struct rapl_model *) id->driver_data;
 
-	rapl_msrs = rm->rapl_msrs;
+	rapl_msrs = rapl_model->rapl_msrs;
 
 	rapl_cntr_mask = perf_msr_probe(rapl_msrs, PERF_RAPL_MAX,
-					false, (void *) &rm->events);
+					false, (void *) &rapl_model->events);
 
-	ret = rapl_check_hw_unit(rm);
+	ret = rapl_check_hw_unit();
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.34.1