[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHUa44GAiUf9+PxqhXOwGfOuc250YDyJ7uzGe2B1bGmBw2iegg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:52:31 +0200
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Manuel Traut <manut@...ka.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@...ux.microsoft.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] optee: probe RPMB device using RPMB subsystem
Hi Manuel,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 11:10 AM Manuel Traut <manut@...ka.net> wrote:
>
> On 14:13 Mon 27 May , Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/arm_ffa.h>
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/rpmb.h>
> > #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > @@ -903,6 +904,10 @@ static int optee_ffa_probe(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev)
> > optee->ffa.bottom_half_value = U32_MAX;
> > optee->rpc_param_count = rpc_param_count;
> >
> > + if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RPMB) &&
> > + (sec_caps & OPTEE_FFA_SEC_CAP_RPMB_PROBE))
> > + optee->in_kernel_rpmb_routing = true;
>
> The SEC_CAP_RPMB_PROBE flag seems to be missing in optee_os at the moment.
> If I remove this check here, the series works for me.
You're right, I missed pushing those flags to optee_os. I've pushed them now.
Cheers,
Jens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists