lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240610141156.GDZmcJrEi11xESpy3a@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:11:56 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Free EFI memory map only when installing a new
 one.

+ Dan because of

f0ef6523475f ("efi: Fix efi_memmap_alloc() leaks")

Thanks Ard.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> 
> The logic in __efi_memmap_init() is shared between two different
> execution flows:
> - mapping the EFI memory map early or late into the kernel VA space, so
>   that its entries can be accessed;
> - cloning the EFI memory map in order to insert new entries that are
>   created as a result of creating a memory reservation
>   (efi_arch_mem_reserve())
> 
> In the former case, the underlying memory containing the kernel's view
> of the EFI memory map (which may be heavily modified by the kernel
> itself on x86) is not modified at all, and the only thing that changes
> is the virtual mapping of this memory, which is different between early
> and late boot.
> 
> In the latter case, an entirely new allocation is created that carries a
> new, updated version of the kernel's view of the EFI memory map. When
> installing this new version, the old version will no longer be
> referenced, and if the memory was allocated by the kernel, it will leak
> unless it gets freed.
> 
> The logic that implements this freeing currently lives on the code path
> that is shared between these two use cases, but it should only apply to
> the latter. So move it to the correct spot.
> 
> Cc: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/36ad5079-4326-45ed-85f6-928ff76483d3@amd.com
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/memmap.c | 5 +++++
>  drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c  | 5 -----
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/memmap.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/memmap.c
> index 4ef20b49eb5e..4990244e5168 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/memmap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/memmap.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ int __init efi_memmap_install(struct efi_memory_map_data *data)
>  	if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	if (efi.memmap.flags & (EFI_MEMMAP_MEMBLOCK | EFI_MEMMAP_SLAB))
> +		__efi_memmap_free(efi.memmap.phys_map,
> +				  efi.memmap.desc_size * efi.memmap.nr_map,
> +				  efi.memmap.flags);
> +
>  	return __efi_memmap_init(data);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> index 3365944f7965..3759e95a7407 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> @@ -51,11 +51,6 @@ int __init __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (efi.memmap.flags & (EFI_MEMMAP_MEMBLOCK | EFI_MEMMAP_SLAB))
> -		__efi_memmap_free(efi.memmap.phys_map,
> -				  efi.memmap.desc_size * efi.memmap.nr_map,
> -				  efi.memmap.flags);
> -
>  	map.phys_map = data->phys_map;
>  	map.nr_map = data->size / data->desc_size;
>  	map.map_end = map.map + data->size;
> -- 
> 2.45.2.505.gda0bf45e8d-goog
> 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ