[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <231a8ee8-b66d-4d40-a9ff-9fdf4918944b@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:31:58 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Move identify_cpu_without_cpuid() into main
branch
On 10.06.24 г. 17:03 ч., Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, May 21 2024 at 15:48, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> No point in duplicating if (!have_cpuid_p()) check. Simply move
>> identify_cpu_without_cpuid() into the else branch. No functional
>> changes.
>
> You wish :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> index 2b170da84f97..69265c0acaea 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> @@ -1578,9 +1578,6 @@ static void __init early_identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> memset(&c->x86_capability, 0, sizeof(c->x86_capability));
>> c->extended_cpuid_level = 0;
>>
>> - if (!have_cpuid_p())
>> - identify_cpu_without_cpuid(c);
>> -
>
> You might look what identify_cpu_without_cpuid() does and how the
> comment right here might be related:
Doh, fair enough. OTOH is Cyrix still relevant? Google says Defunct:
November 11, 1997; 26 years ago
>
>> /* cyrix could have cpuid enabled via c_identify()*/
>> if (have_cpuid_p()) {
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists