linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] pwm-regulator with voltage table problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:36:53 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...utedevices.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pwm-regulator with voltage table problem

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 03:00:24PM +0300, George Stark wrote:
> Here is the situation we've met on an ARM SoC:

Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that 
any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
lost. 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)