linux-kernel - [PATCH v7 03/16] selftests/resctrl: Make "bandwidth" consistent in comments & prints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240610151457.7305-4-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:14:44 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
	Maciej Wieczór-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 03/16] selftests/resctrl: Make "bandwidth" consistent in comments & prints

Resctrl selftests refer to "bandwidth" currently in two other forms in
the code ("B/W" and "band width").

Use "bandwidth" consistently everywhere. While at it, fix also one
"over flow" -> "overflow" on a line that is touched by the change.

Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
---

v3:
- New patch
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 14 +++++++-------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c   |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
index 3c7f6793c261..5fad7e757af3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
@@ -361,11 +361,11 @@ static void do_imc_mem_bw_test(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * get_mem_bw_imc - Memory band width as reported by iMC counters
+ * get_mem_bw_imc - Memory bandwidth as reported by iMC counters
  * @bw_report: Bandwidth report type (reads, writes)
  *
- * Memory B/W utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated using
- * iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters.
+ * Memory bandwidth utilized by a process on a socket can be calculated
+ * using iMC counters. Perf events are used to read these counters.
  *
  * Return: = 0 on success. < 0 on failure.
  */
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int get_mem_bw_imc(char *bw_report, float *bw_imc)
 
 	/*
 	 * Get results which are stored in struct type imc_counter_config
-	 * Take over flow into consideration before calculating total b/w
+	 * Take overflow into consideration before calculating total bandwidth.
 	 */
 	for (imc = 0; imc < imcs; imc++) {
 		struct imc_counter_config *r =
@@ -389,13 +389,13 @@ static int get_mem_bw_imc(char *bw_report, float *bw_imc)
 
 		if (read(r->fd, &r->return_value,
 			 sizeof(struct membw_read_format)) == -1) {
-			ksft_perror("Couldn't get read b/w through iMC");
+			ksft_perror("Couldn't get read bandwidth through iMC");
 			return -1;
 		}
 
 		if (read(w->fd, &w->return_value,
 			 sizeof(struct membw_read_format)) == -1) {
-			ksft_perror("Couldn't get write bw through iMC");
+			ksft_perror("Couldn't get write bandwidth through iMC");
 			return -1;
 		}
 
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static FILE *open_mem_bw_resctrl(const char *mbm_bw_file)
 
 	fp = fopen(mbm_bw_file, "r");
 	if (!fp)
-		ksft_perror("Failed to open total bw file");
+		ksft_perror("Failed to open total memory bandwidth file");
 
 	return fp;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 1cade75176eb..9b86f826a40c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ int validate_bw_report_request(char *bw_report)
 	if (strcmp(bw_report, "total") == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	fprintf(stderr, "Requested iMC B/W report type unavailable\n");
+	fprintf(stderr, "Requested iMC bandwidth report type unavailable\n");
 
 	return -1;
 }
-- 
2.39.2