lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0556ee55-6bdf-4392-8933-03539768f671@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:04:24 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Amer Al Shanawany <amer.shanawany@...il.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 Swarup Laxman Kotiaklapudi <swarupkotikalapudi@...il.com>,
 Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
 kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: proc: remove unreached code and fix build
 warning

On 6/7/24 09:25, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:25:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:24:47 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:42:20PM +0200, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
>>>> fix the following warning:
>>>> proc-empty-vm.c:385:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’
>>>
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c
>>>> @@ -381,9 +381,6 @@ static int test_proc_pid_statm(pid_t pid)
>>>
>>>> -	if (0) {
>>>> -		write(1, buf, rv);
>>>> -	}
>>>
>>> no thanks
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>> Why does that code exist anyway?  It at least needs a comment.
> 
> OK, whatever.
> 
> If test fails, it better record buggy output somewhere (to coredump or to terminal).

+1 on reporting results - the best way to do this is to add a meaningful message
for users to understand what went wrong.

Please suggest how you would like this warning addressed and report the error.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ