[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zmh1NXtY5W63BmRt@optiplex-fbsd>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:03:01 -0400
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix rpmbuild warnings for kernel.spec
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:00:18AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:39 AM Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Newer revisions of rpmbuild are throwing warnings about the current
> > kernel.spec template having an unversioned kernel-headers in the
> > 'Obsoletes:' field and not being able to source the epoch's date from
> > the spec's missing '%changelog' section:
> >
> > $ make srcrpm-pkg
> > UPD include/config/kernel.release
> > GEN rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec
> > UPD .tmp_HEAD
> > ARCHIVE linux.tar.gz
> > rpmbuild -bs rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec --define='_topdir /mnt/nfs/work/kernel/linux/rpmbuild'
> > warning: line 34: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: kernel-headers
> > warning: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
> > Wrote: /mnt/nfs/work/kernel/linux/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kernel-6.10.0_rc3-1.src.rpm
> >
> > RPM build warnings:
> > line 34: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: kernel-headers
> > source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
> >
> > This patch addresses both RPM build warnings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > scripts/package/kernel.spec | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/package/kernel.spec b/scripts/package/kernel.spec
> > index e095eb1e290e..4d58b29c03ad 100644
> > --- a/scripts/package/kernel.spec
> > +++ b/scripts/package/kernel.spec
> > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> > +%global source_date_epoch_from_changelog 0
> >
>
>
> Another possibility might be to add %changelog section.
>
> In Debian packaging, debian/changelog is a requirement.
>
> scripts/package/mkdebian generates a very small
> debian/changelog with a single log entry.
>
I'll take a stab at it, then. Thanks for the pointer!
Cheers,
-- Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists