[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240611125440.6d095270@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:54:40 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Dongliang Cui <dongliang.cui@...soc.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, ebiggers@...nel.org,
ke.wang@...soc.com, hongyu.jin.cn@...il.com, niuzhiguo84@...il.com,
hao_hao.wang@...soc.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akailash@...gle.com,
cuidongliang390@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] block: Add ioprio to block_rq tracepoint
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:26:54 -0700
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
> On 6/11/24 12:35 AM, Dongliang Cui wrote:
> > +#define IOPRIO_CLASS_STRINGS \
> > + { IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE, "none" }, \
> > + { IOPRIO_CLASS_RT, "rt" }, \
> > + { IOPRIO_CLASS_BE, "be" }, \
> > + { IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE, "idle" }, \
> > + { IOPRIO_CLASS_INVALID, "invalid"}
>
> Shouldn't this array be defined in a C file instead of in a header file?
The way the TRACE_EVENT() macro works, this will not work in a C file.
> - TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u [%d]",
> + TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u %s,%u,%u [%d]",
> MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> __entry->rwbs, __get_str(cmd),
> - (unsigned long long)__entry->sector,
> - __entry->nr_sector, 0)
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->sector, __entry->nr_sector,
> + __print_symbolic(IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(__entry->ioprio),
> + IOPRIO_CLASS_STRINGS),
> + IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(__entry->ioprio),
> + IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(__entry->ioprio), 0)
> );
>
It's used for __print_symbolic() which the TRACE_EVENT() macro logic (using
header files) will expand it to something useful.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists