lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:49:10 +0000
From: "Wang, Weilin" <weilin.wang@...el.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
	<acme@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar
	<mingo@...hat.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Kan Liang" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, "linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Taylor, Perry" <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
	"Alt, Samantha" <samantha.alt@...el.com>, "Biggers, Caleb"
	<caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v12 6/8] perf stat: Add command line option for
 enabling tpebs recording



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 9:50 AM
> To: Wang, Weilin <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>; Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...nel.org>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>; Ingo Molnar
> <mingo@...hat.com>; Alexander Shishkin
> <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>; Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>; Hunter,
> Adrian <adrian.hunter@...el.com>; Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>;
> linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Taylor, Perry
> <perry.taylor@...el.com>; Alt, Samantha <samantha.alt@...el.com>; Biggers,
> Caleb <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 6/8] perf stat: Add command line option for
> enabling tpebs recording
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:24 PM <weilin.wang@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> >
> > With this command line option, tpebs recording is turned off in perf stat on
> > default. It will only be turned on when this option is given in perf stat
> > command.
> >
> > Exampe with --enable-tpebs-recording:
> >
> > perf stat -M tma_dtlb_store -a --enable-tpebs-recording sleep 1
> >
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.000 MB - ]
> >
> >  Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> >
> >        181,047,168      cpu_core/TOPDOWN.SLOTS/          #      0.6 %
> tma_dtlb_store
> >          3,195,608      cpu_core/topdown-retiring/
> >         40,156,649      cpu_core/topdown-mem-bound/
> >          3,550,925      cpu_core/topdown-bad-spec/
> >        117,571,818      cpu_core/topdown-fe-bound/
> >         57,118,087      cpu_core/topdown-be-bound/
> >             69,179      cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.BOUND_ON_STORES/
> >              4,582      cpu_core/MEM_INST_RETIRED.STLB_HIT_STORES/
> >         30,183,104      cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.DISTRIBUTED/
> >         30,556,790      cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/
> >            168,486      cpu_core/DTLB_STORE_MISSES.WALK_ACTIVE/
> >                  0      MEM_INST_RETIRED.STLB_HIT_STORES:R
> 
> Here I guess we can expect a non-zero value, right?

Hi Namhyung, 

Do you mean when we have the option, we should expect non-zero value? 
During the execution, it's possible that we don't capture any sample on this 
event. In this case, we would have a zero value. In the future, I think we will
give it the default value instead of zero.

> 
> >
> >        1.003105924 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > Exampe without --enable-tpebs-recording:
> >
> > perf stat -M tma_dtlb_store -a sleep 1
> >
> >  Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> >
> >        181,047,168      cpu_core/TOPDOWN.SLOTS/          #      0.6 %
> tma_dtlb_store
> >          3,195,608      cpu_core/topdown-retiring/
> >         40,156,649      cpu_core/topdown-mem-bound/
> >          3,550,925      cpu_core/topdown-bad-spec/
> >        117,571,818      cpu_core/topdown-fe-bound/
> >         57,118,087      cpu_core/topdown-be-bound/
> >             69,179      cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.BOUND_ON_STORES/
> >              4,582      cpu_core/MEM_INST_RETIRED.STLB_HIT_STORES/
> >         30,183,104      cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.DISTRIBUTED/
> >         30,556,790      cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/
> >            168,486      cpu_core/DTLB_STORE_MISSES.WALK_ACTIVE/
> >                  0      MEM_INST_RETIRED.STLB_HIT_STORES:R
> >
> >        1.003105924 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > index 14be132f7b6f..055139e44763 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -1235,6 +1235,8 @@ static struct option stat_options[] = {
> 
> What's the base of your patchset?  I think we moved this to cmd_stat().
> Please make sure to rebase on the perf-tools-next.

This was rebased on top of Ian's change for the tool event and retire_latency parser 
patches. I think that was on tmp.perf-tools.next. I will rebase on perf-tools-next. 

> 
> 
> >                        "disable adding events for the metric threshold calculation"),
> >         OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "topdown", &topdown_run,
> >                         "measure top-down statistics"),
> > +       OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "enable-tpebs-recording", &tpebs_recording,
> > +                       "enable recording for tpebs when retire_latency required"),
> 
> Please update the documentation (man page) for this option.
> 
> Also I'm afraid it'd fail to build on non-x86 because tpebes_recording
> is defined in intel-tpebs.c.
> 

Yes, you are right. I forgot about non-x86. I will update this and also the 
Documentation.

Thanks,
Weilin

> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> 
> >         OPT_UINTEGER(0, "td-level", &stat_config.topdown_level,
> >                         "Set the metrics level for the top-down statistics (0: max level)"),
> >         OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "smi-cost", &smi_cost,
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ