[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240611-retorted-variety-cd69c39238eb@spud>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:56:53 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:10:54PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:37:17AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > The PCI host controller on PolarFire SoC has multiple "instances", each
> > with their own bridge and ctrl address spaces. The original binding has
> > an "apb" register region, and it is expected to be set to the base
> > address of the host controllers register space. Defines in the driver
> > were used to compute the addresses of the bridge and ctrl address ranges
> > corresponding to instance1. Some customers want to use instance0 however
> > and that requires changing the defines in the driver, which is clearly
> > not a portable solution.
> >
> > The binding has been changed from a single register region to a pair,
> > corresponding to the bridge and ctrl regions respectively, so modify the
> > driver to read these regions directly from the devicetree rather than
> > compute them from the base address of the abp region.
> >
> > To maintain backwards compatibility with the existing binding, the
> > driver retains code to handle the "abp" reg and computes the base
> > address of the bridge and ctrl regions using the defines if it is
> > present. reg-names has always been a required property, so this is
> > safe to do.
>
> When you update this, can you add something about the objective to the
> subject line? "rework reg region handling" just says "we did
> something", but not why or what the benefit is.
>
> The cover letter ("support using either instance 1 or 2") has good
> information that could be part of this.
Ye, sure.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists