linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] riscv: hwprobe: Document thead vendor extensions and xtheadvector extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZmipwVN/WBCQcJdY@ghost>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:47:13 -0700
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
To: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>,
	Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] riscv: hwprobe: Document thead vendor
 extensions and xtheadvector extension

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 08:58:37AM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:57 PM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Document support for thead vendor extensions using the key
> > RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VENDOR_EXT_THEAD_0 and xtheadvector extension using
> > the key RISCV_HWPROBE_VENDOR_EXT_XTHEADVECTOR.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> > index 204cd4433af5..9c0ef8c57228 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> > @@ -214,3 +214,13 @@ The following keys are defined:
> >
> >  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
> >    represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
> > +
> > +* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VENDOR_EXT_THEAD_0`: A bitmask containing the
> 
> Our recent snafoo with CPUPERF_0 popped into my memory
> when reading this. Does this work properly with the WHICH_CPUS flag?
> Specifically, we need hwprobe_key_is_bitmask() to return true for this
> key since it's a bitmask.

Hmm yes I need to add that. Thank you.

- Charlie