[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fff6e4d3-4a11-4481-b28c-edfb072daf35@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 21:50:52 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Stefano Stabellini
<sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: pass meminit_context to __free_pages_core()
On 11.06.24 21:41, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 11:09 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> In preparation for further changes, let's teach __free_pages_core()
>> about the differences of memory hotplug handling.
>>
>> Move the memory hotplug specific handling from generic_online_page() to
>> __free_pages_core(), use adjust_managed_page_count() on the memory
>> hotplug path, and spell out why memory freed via memblock
>> cannot currently use adjust_managed_page_count().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/internal.h | 3 ++-
>> mm/kmsan/init.c | 2 +-
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 9 +--------
>> mm/mm_init.c | 4 ++--
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
>> index 12e95fdf61e90..3fdee779205ab 100644
>> --- a/mm/internal.h
>> +++ b/mm/internal.h
>> @@ -604,7 +604,8 @@ extern void __putback_isolated_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
>> int mt);
>> extern void memblock_free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
>> unsigned int order);
>> -extern void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
>> +extern void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
>> + enum meminit_context);
>
> Shouldn't the above be
> enum meminit_context context);
Although C allows parameters without names in declarations, this was
unintended.
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists