[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240611074850.tiaieba2bswwck6d@quack3>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:48:50 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@....ru>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: balloc: prevent integer overflow in
udf_bitmap_free_blocks()
On Mon 10-06-24 10:25:22, Roman Smirnov wrote:
> An overflow may occur if the function is called with the last
> block and an offset greater than zero. It is necessary to add
> a check to avoid this.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@....ru>
Thanks for the patch! Actually there are overflow checks just a few lines
above the place you modify:
if (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count < count ||
(bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) > partmap->s_partition_len) {
So please update those to take 'offset' into account instead. Also please
use check_add_overflow() for the integer overflow check.
Honza
> ---
> fs/udf/balloc.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/balloc.c b/fs/udf/balloc.c
> index ab3ffc355949..cd83bbc7d890 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/balloc.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,13 @@ static void udf_bitmap_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
> block = bloc->logicalBlockNum + offset +
> (sizeof(struct spaceBitmapDesc) << 3);
>
> + if (block < offset + (sizeof(struct spaceBitmapDesc) << 3)) {
> + udf_debug("integer overflow: %u + %u + %zu",
> + bloc->logicalBlockNum, offset,
> + sizeof(struct spaceBitmapDesc) << 3);
> + goto error_return;
> + }
> +
> do {
> overflow = 0;
> block_group = block >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits + 3);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists