lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240611091049.lrypvvluntf37uff@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 14:40:49 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...mail.com>, beata.michalska@....com,
	rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hotran@....com,
	Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq/cppc: Remove the desired_perf compare when
 set target

On 11-06-24, 09:54, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> It's alright with me.

Great.

> Some "nits":
>  - the "desired_perf" local variable could be removed in this case.

Riwen, please fix this and resend.

>  - [note] while this change helps, we'd still need policy->cur to always
>    have the latest request value (see details at [1]) for this check to
>    be made obsolete by the comparison between target_freq and policy->cur,
>    as mentioned in the commit message. But this is/can be a separate
>    matter.
> 
>    [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZmB1qKucR5fXk100@arm.com/

Yeah, lets discuss that in the other thread only.

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ