linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vfio/qat: add PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:27:22 +0100
From: "Cabiddu, Giovanni" <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, "Zeng, Xin"
	<xin.zeng@...el.com>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann
	<arnd@...db.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Yishai Hadas
	<yishaih@...dia.com>, Shameer Kolothum
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "Cao, Yahui" <yahui.cao@...el.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qat-linux <qat-linux@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/qat: add PCI_IOV dependency

Hi Herbert,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:20:50AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:26:59PM +0100, Cabiddu, Giovanni wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 03:34:06PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > Is this then being taken care of in the QAT PF driver?  Are there
> > > patches posted targeting v6.10?
> > Yes. This is being taken care in the QAT PF driver. Xin just sent a fix
> > for it [1].
> > @Herbert, can this be sent to stable after the review?
> 
> This patch wasn't sent to linux-crypto so I cannot apply it.
Was sent yesterday to linux-crypto:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/20240610143756.2031626-1-xin.zeng@intel.com/

> In any case, is there any reason why the fix can't go through the
> vfio tree?
It is a change in the QAT driver. That's why I asked.

Anyway, it should be fixed as part of v6.10 - I was wrong saying it
should be sent to stable.

Regards,

-- 
Giovanni