[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmhbQgXxyhZ7shBh@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:12:18 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Cc: hauke@...ke-m.de, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: pci: lantiq: restore reset gpio polarity
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 11:04:00AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote:
> Commit 90c2d2eb7ab5 ("MIPS: pci: lantiq: switch to using gpiod API") not
> only switched to the gpiod API, but also inverted / changed the polarity
> of the GPIO.
>
> According to the PCI specification, the RST# pin is an active-low
> signal. However, most of the device trees that have been widely used for
> a long time (mainly in the openWrt project) define this GPIO as
> active-high and the old driver code inverted the signal internally.
>
> Apparently there are actually boards where the reset gpio must be
> operated inverted. For this reason, we cannot use the GPIOD_OUT_LOW/HIGH
> flag for initialization. Instead, we must explicitly set the gpio to
> value 1 in order to take into account any "GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW" flag that
> may have been set.
>
> In order to remain compatible with all these existing device trees, we
> should therefore keep the logic as it was before the commit.
>
> Fixes: 90c2d2eb7ab5 ("MIPS: pci: lantiq: switch to using gpiod API")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
> ---
> arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
applied to mips-fixes
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists