[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmhdWw/dV5HRU/Nh@colin-ia-desktop>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:21:15 -0500
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: omap2-mcspi multi mode
Hi Louis,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 04:45:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:14:27PM -0500, Colin Foster wrote:
>
> > So I think the question I have is:
>
> > Should the CS line be de-asserted at the end of "spi_write"?
>
> Absent bodging with cs_change after any spi message the chip select
> should be left deasserted.
Do you have hardware to reproduce my results of two spi messages no
longer toggling the CS line and leaving the line at GND through the
transactions?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists