[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <437936a4e554b02e04566dd6e3f0a5d08370cc8c.1718207789.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:58:28 -0600
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: andrii@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
shuah@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com,
olsajiri@...il.com,
quentin@...valent.com,
alan.maguire@...cle.com,
acme@...nel.org
Cc: martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
mykolal@...com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/12] bpf: selftests: Fix bpf_cpumask_first_zero() kfunc prototype
The prototype in progs/nested_trust_common.h is not in line with how the
actual kfuncs are defined in kernel/bpf/cpumask.c. This causes compilation
errors when kfunc prototypes are generated from BTF.
Fix by aligning with actual kfunc definitions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_common.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_common.h
index 83d33931136e..1784b496be2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_common.h
@@ -7,6 +7,6 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
bool bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(unsigned int cpu, const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
-bool bpf_cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
+__u32 bpf_cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
#endif /* _NESTED_TRUST_COMMON_H */
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists