[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bA75p3LW95i79uiEfkg9AS0cKVfhKZMatHHQfRB4PJFZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:53:20 -0400
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sourav Panda <souravpanda@...gle.com>, corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
rppt@...nel.org, david@...hat.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
chenlinxuan@...ontech.com, yang.yang29@....com.cn, tomas.mudrunka@...il.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, ivan@...udflare.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, shakeelb@...gle.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, adobriyan@...il.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, surenb@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
willy@...radead.org, weixugc@...gle.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13] mm: report per-page metadata information
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 6:30 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:27:51 +0000 Sourav Panda <souravpanda@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Today, we do not have any observability of per-page metadata
> > and how much it takes away from the machine capacity. Thus,
> > we want to describe the amount of memory that is going towards
> > per-page metadata, which can vary depending on build
> > configuration, machine architecture, and system use.
> >
> > This patch adds 2 fields to /proc/vmstat that can used as shown
> > below:
> >
> > Accounting per-page metadata allocated by boot-allocator:
> > /proc/vmstat:nr_memmap_boot * PAGE_SIZE
> >
> > Accounting per-page metadata allocated by buddy-allocator:
> > /proc/vmstat:nr_memmap * PAGE_SIZE
> >
> > Accounting total Perpage metadata allocated on the machine:
> > (/proc/vmstat:nr_memmap_boot +
> > /proc/vmstat:nr_memmap) * PAGE_SIZE
>
> Under what circumstances do these change? Only hotplug?
Currently, there are several reasons these numbers can change during runtime:
1. Memory hotplug/hotremove
2. Adding/Removing hugetlb pages with vmemmap optimization
3. Adding/Removing Device DAX with vmemmap optimization.
>
> It's nasty, but would it be sufficient to simply emit these numbers
> into dmesg when they change?
These numbers should really be part of /proc/vmstat in order to
provide an interface for determining the system memory overhead.
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists