linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: kvm: remove print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZmnksmC4u5lP5am9@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:10:58 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, 
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, 
	Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, 
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>, 
	Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, 
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kernel@...labora.com, 
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: kvm: remove print_skip()

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, Dev Jain wrote:
> 
> On 6/12/24 16:14, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> > index 4f5881d4ef66d..695c45635d257 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> > @@ -144,10 +144,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >   	free((void *)hv_cpuid_entries);
> >   	if (!kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX) ||
> > -	    !kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS)) {
> > -		print_skip("Enlightened VMCS is unsupported");
> > -		goto do_sys;
> > -	}
> > +	    !kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS))
> > +		ksft_exit_skip("Enlightened VMCS is unsupported\n");
> > +
> 
> Isn't it incorrect to delete 'goto do_sys'? ksft_exit_skip() will exit and the
> program will never jump to that label. At other places too you have deleted the 'goto'.

Ya, exiting instead of continuing on will break these tests.