linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv11 05/19] x86/relocate_kernel: Use named labels for less confusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <addbd29a-66dc-4180-ae45-ef038c2249d1@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:06:07 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
 Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
 Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
 Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, "Kalra, Ashish"
 <ashish.kalra@....com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
 Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
 Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 05/19] x86/relocate_kernel: Use named labels for less
 confusion

On 12/06/2024 10:22 am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:26:17AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 6/4/24 08:21, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>  From b45fe48092abad2612c2bafbb199e4de80c99545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:53:11 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCHv11.1 06/19] x86/kexec: Keep CR4.MCE set during kexec for TDX guest
>>>
>>> TDX guests run with MCA enabled (CR4.MCE=1b) from the very start. If
>>> that bit is cleared during CR4 register reprogramming during boot or
>>> kexec flows, a #VE exception will be raised which the guest kernel
>>> cannot handle it.
>>>
>>> Therefore, make sure the CR4.MCE setting is preserved over kexec too and
>>> avoid raising any #VEs.
>>>
>>> The change doesn't affect non-TDX-guest environments.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S | 17 ++++++++++-------
>>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
>>> index 085eef5c3904..9c2cf70c5f54 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>>>    */
>>>   #include <linux/linkage.h>
>>> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
>>> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
>>>   #include <asm/page_types.h>
>>>   #include <asm/kexec.h>
>>>   #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
>>> @@ -145,14 +147,15 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
>>>   	 * Set cr4 to a known state:
>>>   	 *  - physical address extension enabled
>>>   	 *  - 5-level paging, if it was enabled before
>>> +	 *  - Machine check exception on TDX guest, if it was enabled before.
>>> +	 *    Clearing MCE might not be allowed in TDX guests, depending on setup.
>>> +	 *
>>> +	 * Use R13 that contains the original CR4 value, read in relocate_kernel().
>>> +	 * PAE is always set in the original CR4.
>>>   	 */
>>> -	movl	$X86_CR4_PAE, %eax
>>> -	testq	$X86_CR4_LA57, %r13
>>> -	jz	.Lno_la57
>>> -	orl	$X86_CR4_LA57, %eax
>>> -.Lno_la57:
>>> -
>>> -	movq	%rax, %cr4
>>> +	andl	$(X86_CR4_PAE | X86_CR4_LA57), %r13d
>>> +	ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(orl $X86_CR4_MCE, %r13d), X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST
>>> +	movq	%r13, %cr4
>> If this is the case, I don't really see a reason to clear MCE per se as I'm
>> guessing a machine check here will be fatal anyway? It just changes the
>> method of death.
> Andrew had a strong opinion on method of death here.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1144340e-dd95-ee3b-dabb-579f9a65b3c7@citrix.com

Not sure if I intended it to come across that strongly, but given a
choice, the !CR4.MCE death is cleaner because at least you're not
interpreting garbage and trying to use it as a valid IDT.

~Andrew