linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] ipmi: ssif_bmc: support skipping ARM SBMR bootprogress response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240612043255.1849007-3-potin.lai.pt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:32:55 +0800
From: Potin Lai <potin.lai.pt@...il.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Quan Nguyen <quan@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Patrick Williams <patrick@...cx.xyz>,
	Cosmo Chou <cosmo.chou@...ntatw.com>,
	Potin Lai <potin.lai@...ntatw.com>,
	Potin Lai <potin.lai.pt@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ipmi: ssif_bmc: support skipping ARM SBMR bootprogress response

In ARM SBMR document, the host can chosse to not read back the response of
“Send Boot Progress Code” command.

To avoid SSIF being in a wrong state due to host not read back the
response, add the implementation of "arm-sbmr,skip-bootprogress-response"
property for skipping the response of "Send Boot Progress Code" command
from userspace.

Signed-off-by: Potin Lai <potin.lai.pt@...il.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
index 56346fb328727..3386a8bd18afd 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
@@ -39,6 +39,11 @@
 #define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START          0x3
 #define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE         0x9
 
+#define GET_NETFN(netfn_lun)                    ((netfn_lun >> 2) & 0xfe)
+#define IPMI_GROUP_EXT_NETFN                    0x2C
+#define IPMI_SBMR_GROUP                         0xAE
+#define IPMI_SBMR_BOOTPROGRESS_CMD              0x02
+
 /*
  * IPMI 2.0 Spec, section 12.7 SSIF Timing,
  * Request-to-Response Time is T6max(250ms) - T1max(20ms) - 3ms = 227ms
@@ -102,6 +107,8 @@ struct ssif_bmc_ctx {
 	struct ssif_part_buffer part_buf;
 	struct ipmi_ssif_msg    response;
 	struct ipmi_ssif_msg    request;
+	/* Flag to skip response of Send Boot Progress Code */
+	bool                    skip_bootprogress_resp;
 };
 
 static inline struct ssif_bmc_ctx *to_ssif_bmc(struct file *file)
@@ -187,6 +194,20 @@ static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+	if (ssif_bmc->skip_bootprogress_resp &&
+	    GET_NETFN(msg.payload[0]) == IPMI_GROUP_EXT_NETFN &&
+	    msg.payload[1] == IPMI_SBMR_BOOTPROGRESS_CMD &&
+	    msg.payload[3] == IPMI_SBMR_GROUP) {
+		if (ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited) {
+			del_timer(&ssif_bmc->response_timer);
+			ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited = false;
+		}
+		ssif_bmc->busy = false;
+		memset(&ssif_bmc->request, 0, sizeof(struct ipmi_ssif_msg));
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
+		return count;
+	}
+
 	while (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
 		if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
@@ -806,6 +827,10 @@ static int ssif_bmc_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	if (!ssif_bmc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	if (of_property_read_bool(client->dev.of_node,
+				  "arm-sbmr,skip-bootprogress-response"))
+		ssif_bmc->skip_bootprogress_resp = true;
+
 	spin_lock_init(&ssif_bmc->lock);
 
 	init_waitqueue_head(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
-- 
2.31.1