linux-kernel - Re: [v4,1/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: Fix mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:51:55 +0530
From: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        <rfoss@...nel.org>, <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        <mripard@...nel.org>, <jonas@...boo.se>, <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <a-bhatia1@...com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [v4,1/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: Fix mode_valid hook

Hello Sui, Sam!

Thanks for the review.

(Sorry for delayed response. I was OoO last week)

On 31/05/24 19:34, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Hi, Jayesh
> 
> 
> On 5/31/24 21:33, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> Hi Jayesh,
>>
>>>> +
>>>>    static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
>>>>        .attach = sii902x_bridge_attach,
>>>>        .mode_set = sii902x_bridge_mode_set,
>>>> @@ -516,6 +529,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs 
>>>> sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
>>>>        .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_destroy_state,
>>>>        .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = 
>>>> sii902x_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
>>>>        .atomic_check = sii902x_bridge_atomic_check,
>>>> +    .mode_valid = sii902x_bridge_mode_valid,
>>
>> As you have the possibility to test the driver, it would be nice with a
>> follow-up patch that replaces the use of enable() / disable() with the
>> atomic counterparts.
>>
>> enable() / disable() are deprecated, so it is nice to reduce their use.
> 
> I agree with Sam.
> 
> Please using atomic uniformally with a follow-up patch, the mixed
> using of atomic API and non atomic API is a little bit confusing IMO.
> 
> 

I will change the enable and disable to their atomic counter parts in 
the next revision.

Warm Regards,
-Jayesh