linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Add panel CSOT MNB601LS1-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGoogDCjpanCwHHuYEu0kU9grv8qy002Utnm1JgRAw-o6TY8=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:08:34 +0800
From: Xuxin Xiong <xuxinxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch, 
	hsinyi@...gle.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Add panel CSOT MNB601LS1-1

I'm so sorry for the late reply.
The information we got from the CSOT is that when the project was
first started, CSO was used. Later, they realized this problem and
changed the VID of other panel models to CSW. Since the panel has
already been shipped, they will keep it as CSO and only the VID for
that panel will be CSO.
Thanks a lot!

Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> 于2024年6月12日周三 00:50写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 9:27 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 8:54 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:55 PM Xuxin Xiong
> > > <xuxinxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Doug, thank you!
> > > > We had reported this info to the CSOT to correct the vendor id.
> > > > If they confirm to fix this with the same product ID, we will submit a
> > > > patch to fix this.
> > >
> > > FYI, "top posting" like this is generally frowned upon on kernel
> > > mailing lists. One such reference about this is [1]. Some folks are
> > > very passionate about this topic, so please keep it in mind to avoid
> > > upsetting people in the community.
> > >
> > > In any case: did you get any response from CSOT about the improper EDID?
> >
> > Just following up here. Was there any response from CSOT?
>
> Continuing to follow up here. Did CSOT say anything about this?
>
> -Doug