linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] hwmon: (ina2xx):Add Suppor for passing alert polarity from device tree to driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e0de79ab-63d2-4170-b90b-c714454285fa@axis.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 08:50:57 +0200
From: Amna Waseem <Amna.Waseem@...s.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] hwmon: (ina2xx):Add Suppor for passing alert
 polarity from device tree to driver

On 6/12/24 08:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/06/2024 08:37, Amna Waseem wrote:
>> On 6/12/24 08:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> So you require someone to re-review?
>> Yes that will be great if someone re-review.
> You are joking, right? We have hundreds of other patches to take care of
> and you ignore review tag, so you get duplicated work from the same
> reviewer? That's huge waste of time and actually quite disrespectful to
> our time.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
I donot mean to be disrespectful to the reviewers. Please ignore my 
re-review request.  If the patches needs further changes in the code, I 
will add the tag in the next submission.

Regards

Amna