linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv8 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZzE94QUdhWPmrMzRBRLa=nm86Mdm5vow688jKq3HzJeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 08:02:25 +0100
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-man@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, 
	Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:52 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:21:49 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > as part of the effort on speeding up the uprobes [0] coming with
> > return uprobe optimization by using syscall instead of the trap
> > on the uretprobe trampoline.
> >
> > The speed up depends on instruction type that uprobe is installed
> > and depends on specific HW type, please check patch 1 for details.
> >
> > Patches 1-8 are based on bpf-next/master, but patch 2 and 3 are
> > apply-able on linux-trace.git tree probes/for-next branch.
> > Patch 9 is based on man-pages master.
> >
> > v8 changes:
> > - rebased (another new syscall got merged)
> > - added acks
> >
> > Also available at:
> >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> >   uretprobe_syscall
>
> Applied patch [1/9] - [8/9] on probes/for-next in
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace.git
>

Thanks, Masami, looks good! I also confirmed that probes/for-next and
bpf-next/master can be merged with no conflicts (hopefully it stays
this way till the next merge window).

> Thank you!
>
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > Notes to check list items in Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst:
> >
> > - System Call Alternatives
> >   New syscall seems like the best way in here, because we need
> >   just to quickly enter kernel with no extra arguments processing,
> >   which we'd need to do if we decided to use another syscall.
> >
> > - Designing the API: Planning for Extension
> >   The uretprobe syscall is very specific and most likely won't be
> >   extended in the future.
> >
> >   At the moment it does not take any arguments and even if it does
> >   in future, it's allowed to be called only from trampoline prepared
> >   by kernel, so there'll be no broken user.
> >
> > - Designing the API: Other Considerations
> >   N/A because uretprobe syscall does not return reference to kernel
> >   object.
> >
> > - Proposing the API
> >   Wiring up of the uretprobe system call is in separate change,
> >   selftests and man page changes are part of the patchset.
> >
> > - Generic System Call Implementation
> >   There's no CONFIG option for the new functionality because it
> >   keeps the same behaviour from the user POV.
> >
> > - x86 System Call Implementation
> >   It's 64-bit syscall only.
> >
> > - Compatibility System Calls (Generic)
> >   N/A uretprobe syscall has no arguments and is not supported
> >   for compat processes.
> >
> > - Compatibility System Calls (x86)
> >   N/A uretprobe syscall is not supported for compat processes.
> >
> > - System Calls Returning Elsewhere
> >   N/A.
> >
> > - Other Details
> >   N/A.
> >
> > - Testing
> >   Adding new bpf selftests and ran ltp on top of this change.
> >
> > - Man Page
> >   Attached.
> >
> > - Do not call System Calls in the Kernel
> >   N/A.
> >
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZeCXHKJ--iYYbmLj@krava/
> > ---
> > Jiri Olsa (8):
> >       x86/shstk: Make return uprobe work with shadow stack
> >       uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call
> >       uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe
> >       selftests/x86: Add return uprobe shadow stack test
> >       selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs integrity
> >       selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs changes
> >       selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test
> >       selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe shadow stack test
> >
> >  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl                      |   1 +
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h                                |   4 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c                                     |  16 ++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c                                   | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/syscalls.h                                    |   2 +
> >  include/linux/uprobes.h                                     |   3 +
> >  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h                           |   5 +-
> >  kernel/events/uprobes.c                                     |  24 ++++--
> >  kernel/sys_ni.c                                             |   2 +
> >  tools/include/linux/compiler.h                              |   4 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c       | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c     | 385 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall.c          |  15 ++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c |  17 ++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c             | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  15 files changed, 860 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
> >
> > Jiri Olsa (1):
> >       man2: Add uretprobe syscall page
> >
> >  man/man2/uretprobe.2 | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 man/man2/uretprobe.2
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>