| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2ad59b57-7285-4c1e-af03-c3a0a1c8a1e6@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:06:54 +0800
From: "Aiqun Yu (Maria)" <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>
To: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
Tengfei Fan
<quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs8550: introduce qcs8550 dtsi
On 6/5/2024 8:00 PM, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/06/2024 06:51, Aiqun Yu (Maria) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/2024 7:20 PM, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/06/2024 12:51, Aiqun Yu (Maria) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/3/2024 5:20 PM, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tengfei,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 29/05/2024 12:09, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>>> QCS8550 is derived from SM8550. The difference between SM8550 and
>>>>>> QCS8550 is QCS8550 doesn't have modem RF system. QCS8550 is mainly
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> in IoT products.
>>>>>> QCS8550 firmware has different memory map compared to SM8550.
>>>>>> The memory map will be runtime added through bootloader.
>>>>>> There are 3 types of reserved memory regions here:
>>>>>> 1. Firmware related regions which aren't shared with kernel.
>>>>>> The device tree source in kernel doesn't need to have node to
>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>> the firmware related reserved information. Bootloader converys the
>>>>>> information by updating devicetree at runtime.
>>>>>> This will be described as: UEFI saves the physical address
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> UEFI System Table to dts file's chosen node. Kernel read this
>>>>>> table and
>>>>>> add reserved memory regions to efi config table. Current reserved
>>>>>> memory
>>>>>> region may have reserved region which was not yet used, release
>>>>>> note of
>>>>>> the firmware have such kind of information.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you describing some particular quirk of the platform here, or just
>>>>> standard UEFI booting?
>>>>
>>>> It's standard UEFI booting efi config table.
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for confirming.
>>>>>
>>>>> When booting with UEFI, the memory map is passed via the ESRT, so
>>>>> having
>>>>> memory that the kernel shouldn't use it pretty simple (and typical).
>>>
>>> woo! \o/
>>>>
>>>> yes. It is very simple. And the bootloader firmware config the
>>>> "reserved" region in the efi config table from the uefi firmware.
>>>>>> 2. Firmware related memory regions which are shared with Kernel
>>>>>> The device tree source in the kernel needs to include nodes
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> indicate fimware-related shared information. A label name is
>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>> because this type of shared information needs to be referenced by
>>>>>> specific drivers for handling purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, is there something non-standard here? If not I would suggest
>>>>> dropping these detail comments as they might be misleading.
>>>>
>>>> Detailed comments is used to describe current device tree reserved
>>>> memory regions.
>>>>
>>>> Current patch is not creating a new mechanism to have memory map
>>>> described. But it is the first time qcom device trees use this design,
>>>> and have a simplified(also more compatible) device tree reserved memory
>>>> region(memory map). Previously, bootloader(apps bootloader) only pass
>>>> the whole physical memory base and size, and use reserved memory nodes
>>>> only in device tree(which is also a standard choose).
>>>>
>>>> So that's why it is detailed comments for other qcom platform
>>>> reference.
>>>
>>> Doesn't the rb3gen2 also use this design?
>>
>> Checked current qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts still use the device tree to have
>> all the reserved regions, even have detailed regions like "Firmware
>> related regions which aren't shared with kernel."
>
> Right,
>>
>> Not sure current qcs6490 firmware efi config table looks like, if it
>> have all the reserved region marked carefully on efi config table, then
>> device tree don't need to mention the reserved regions which is not
>> shared to kernel.
>
> That makes sense.
>>
>> The qcom memory map in device tree discussion was happened after qcs6490
>> rb3gen2 time frame. efi config table is standard. But we still need to
>> check what's the final config placed in the table for different
>> platforms. I will suggest to have current qcs8550 as an example to
>> config the current memory non-kernel needed to know region inside the
>> efi config table in bootloader, and have kernel shared reserved region
>> marked in the device tree.
>
> Ok, thanks for explaining the context here. Using the ESRT for this
> certainly makes more sense to me.
>
> So regarding the comment in the reserved-memory node below, I think this
> could be simplified to just a sentence or two explaining how this
> platform is different. Maybe something like:
>
> /* Unlike previous platforms, QCS8550 boots using EFI and describes most
> reserved regions in the ESRT memory map. As a result, reserved memory
> regions which aren't relevant to the kernel (like the hypervisor region)
> don't need to be described in DT. */
The previous message still accounts per my understanding since it can be
referenced to others who are not familiar with the memory map change or
ESRT memory map solution.
I think we can add your above message into the commit message to have
more information. Appreciate the comments if others have similar doubts
as you have.
>
> A few more comments in-line.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>> 3. Remoteproc regions.
>>>>>> Remoteproc regions will be reserved and then assigned to
>>>>>> subsystem
>>>>>> firmware later.
>>>>>> Here is a reserved memory map for this platform:
>>>>>> 0x100000000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> | Firmware Related |
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> 0xd4d00000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> | Kernel Available |
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> 0xa7000000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> | Remoteproc Region |
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> 0x8a800000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> | Firmware Related |
>>>>>> | |
>>>>>> 0x80000000 +-------------------+
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8550.dtsi | 167
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8550.dtsi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8550.dtsi
>>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8550.dtsi
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..685668c6ad14
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8550.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All
>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include "sm8550.dtsi"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/delete-node/ &reserved_memory;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/ {
>>>>>> + reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> + ranges;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* These are 3 types of reserved memory regions here:
>>>>>> + * 1. Firmware related regions which aren't shared with
>>>>>> kernel.
>>>>>> + * The device tree source in kernel doesn't need to have
>>>>>> node to
>>>>>> + * indicate the firmware related reserved information.
>>>>>> Bootloader
>>>>>> + * conveys the information by updating devicetree at
>>>>>> runtime.
>>>>>> + * This will be described as: UEFI saves the physical
>>>>>> address of
>>>>>> + * the UEFI System Table to dts file's chosen node. Kernel
>>>>>> read this
>>>>>> + * table and add reserved memory regions to efi config
>>>>>> table.
>>>>>> Current
>>>>>> + * reserved memory region may have reserved region which was
>>>>>> not yet
>>>>>> + * used, release note of the firmware have such kind of
>>>>>> information.
>>>>>> + * 2. Firmware related memory regions which are shared with
>>>>>> Kernel
>>>>>> + * The device tree source in the kernel needs to include
>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>> + * that indicate fimware-related shared information. A label
>>>>>> name
>>>>>> + * is suggested because this type of shared information
>>>>>> needs to
>>>>>> + * be referenced by specific drivers for handling purposes.
>>>>>> + * 3. Remoteproc regions.
>>>>>> + * Remoteproc regions will be reserved and then
>>>>>> assigned to
>>>>>> + * subsystem firmware later.
>>>>>> + * Here is a reserved memory map for this platform:
>>>>>> + * 0x100000000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * | Firmware Related |
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * 0xd4d00000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * | Kernel Available |
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * 0xa7000000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * | Remoteproc Region |
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * 0x8a800000 +-------------------+
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * | Firmware Related |
>>>>>> + * | |
>>>>>> + * 0x80000000 +-------------------+
>
> I guess this is quite subjective, but this diagram looks "upside down"
> to me. I think it's generally more popular to have the lower addresses
> at the top.
ack.
>
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Firmware related regions, bootloader will possible
>>>>>> reserve
>>>>>> parts of
>>>>>> + * region from 0x80000000..0x8a800000.
>
> This is just duplicating info from the table, please drop this comment
> (it should be obvious from the above explanation).
ack.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> + aop_image_mem: aop-image-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x81c00000 0x0 0x60000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + aop_cmd_db_mem: aop-cmd-db-region@...60000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,cmd-db";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x81c60000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + aop_config_mem: aop-config-region@...80000 {
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x81c80000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + smem_mem: smem-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,smem";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x81d00000 0x0 0x200000>;
>>>>>> + hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + adsp_mhi_mem: adsp-mhi-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x81f00000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* PIL region */
>
> Drop this comment
ack.
>>>>>> + mpss_mem: mpss-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x8a800000 0x0 0x10800000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + q6_mpss_dtb_mem: q6-mpss-dtb-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b000000 0x0 0x80000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + ipa_fw_mem: ipa-fw-region@...80000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b080000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + ipa_gsi_mem: ipa-gsi-region@...90000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b090000 0x0 0xa000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + gpu_micro_code_mem: gpu-micro-code-region@...9a000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b09a000 0x0 0x2000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + spss_region_mem: spss-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b100000 0x0 0x180000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + spu_secure_shared_memory_mem:
>>>>>> spu-secure-shared-memory-region@...80000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b280000 0x0 0x80000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + camera_mem: camera-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9b300000 0x0 0x800000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + video_mem: video-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9bb00000 0x0 0x700000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + cvp_mem: cvp-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9c200000 0x0 0x700000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + cdsp_mem: cdsp-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9c900000 0x0 0x2000000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + q6_cdsp_dtb_mem: q6-cdsp-dtb-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9e900000 0x0 0x80000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + q6_adsp_dtb_mem: q6-adsp-dtb-region@...80000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9e980000 0x0 0x80000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + adspslpi_mem: adspslpi-region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x9ea00000 0x0 0x4080000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Firmware related regions, bootloader will possible
>>>>>> reserve
>>>>>> parts of
>>>>>> + * region from 0xd8000000..0x100000000.
>>>>>> + */
>
> The address specified in this comment (0xd8000000) doesn't match the
> mpss_dsm_mem region OR the diagram above. I would suggest dropping this
> comment too.
ack.
>>>>>> + mpss_dsm_mem: mpss_dsm_region@...00000 {
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0 0xd4d00000 0x0 0x3300000>;
>>>>>> + no-map;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Kind regards,
--
Thx and BRs,
Aiqun(Maria) Yu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists